MEASUREMENT OF POVERTY

Authors

  • Eva Muti’ah Universitas Indraprasta PGRI Jakarta
  • Mira Listiani Universitas Bina Bangsa
  • Nasywa Nathania Sukma Universitas Bina Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46306/bbijbm.v4i3.104

Keywords:

Poverty Measurement, Multidimensional Poverty Index, Economic Deprivation, Policy Intervention, Sustainable Development

Abstract

Poverty measurement is a critical aspect of economic and social policy, providing insights into the extent and severity of deprivation within a population. Various methods and indicators have been developed to assess poverty, ranging from income-based approaches to multidimensional frameworks. Traditional poverty measurement relies on absolute and relative income thresholds, determining whether individuals or households fall below a defined poverty line. However, income alone does not fully capture the complexity of poverty, leading to the development of multidimensional poverty indices that incorporate factors such as education, health, and living standards. This study explores different methodologies used to measure poverty, highlighting their strengths and limitations. The research examines key poverty indicators, including the Headcount Index, Poverty Gap Index, and Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), to provide a comprehensive understanding of poverty assessment. Additionally, it discusses the role of international organizations, such as the World Bank and United Nations, in establishing global poverty measurement standards. The study also considers how economic, social, and policy-related factors influence poverty measurement outcomes. The findings underscore the importance of adopting a multidimensional approach to poverty measurement to better inform policy decisions and intervention strategies. Accurate and comprehensive poverty assessment enables governments and policymakers to design effective poverty alleviation programs tailored to specific population needs. By integrating economic and social dimensions, poverty measurement can contribute to more inclusive and sustainable development efforts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bloomer, J., & Boateng, D. (2024). Prepaid into poverty? Exploring energy poverty and access to alternative electricity sources among urban poor households in Ghana. Energy Research and Social Science, 112(March), 103510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103510

Byaro, M., Mmbaga, N. F., & Mafwolo, G. (2024). Tackling energy poverty: Do clean fuels for cooking and access to electricity improve or worsen health outcomes in sub-Saharan Africa? World Development Sustainability, 4(July 2023), 100125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wds.2024.100125

Charlier, D., Legendre, B., & Ricci, O. (2024). Water and energy deprivation: Addressing the problem of essential utility services poverty in Mayotte. Energy Policy, 195(October). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114364

Clavijo-Núñez, S., Núñez-Camarena, G. M., Herrera-Limones, R., Hernández-Valencia, M., & Millán-Jiménez, A. (2024). The importance of citizen participation in improving comfort and health in obsolete neighbourhoods affected by energy poverty. Energy Policy, 191(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114177

Kerschbaumer, L., Crossett, L., Holaus, M., & Costa, U. (2024). COVID-19 and health inequalities: The impact of social determinants of health on individuals affected by poverty. Health Policy and Technology, 13(1), 100803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100803

Osei, R. D., & Owoo, N. S. (2024). Multi-dimensional poverty and health outcomes in Ghana. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 10(October 2023), 101108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101108

wang, yinuo, Umair, M., Aizhan, A., Teymurova, V., & Chang, L. (2024). Does the disparity between rural and urban incomes affect rural energy poverty? Energy Strategy Reviews, 56(October), 101584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101584

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

Muti’ah, E. ., Listiani, M. ., & Sukma, N. N. . (2024). MEASUREMENT OF POVERTY. Bina Bangsa International Journal of Business and Management, 4(3), 264–294. https://doi.org/10.46306/bbijbm.v4i3.104